|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SUVANABHUMI AIRPORT LATEST NEWS Post reparations - August 18, 2005 Concerning the government demands of the Bangkok Post over the 'fabricated story': They demand that the verdict be published in a full-page advertisement in a top-selling foreign newspaper in each country and aired on global television networks, such as CNBC, CCTV and BBC for one hour per day. Cormac Bracken has a humorous observation about the rather extreme demands: Since commercial networks only have advertising slots of 5-15 minutes per hour, it will be interesting to see how they manage this. Especially if they really do mean BBC (not BBC World), which has never accepted advertising of any kind. I estimate the cost of the remaining newspaper adverts at 3 billion baht, which coincidentally is the approximate market value of Post Publishing. It would also add around 5% to Thailand's monthly trade deficit. AIRPORT
'CRACKS' ROW: Govt may sue over runway report -
The Nation, August 12, 2005
Yesterday: A tale of two newspapers: Airport cracks and the 'fabricated news report' - August 11, 2005 ...The legal threat is a new wave of apparent political pressure that has hit the Bangkok Post over the past few years. The paper is largely owned by the Central Group, which had a showdown with the Transport Ministry over a land-lease contract for its Lat Phrao shopping complex in 2002. The contract extension remains a contentious issue to this day. Also in 2002, the Central Group fought off a takeover bid by a group of shareholders led by a business figure, a bitter battle that many Bangkok Post reporters thought stemmed from attempted political interference. Early last year, Bangkok Post reporters decried the murky transfer of its editor Veera Prateep-chaikul, who was known to have been under pressure from the management following news reports critical of the prime minister... A tale of two newspapers: Airport cracks and the 'fabricated news report' - August 11, 2005 Someone at the Post must have really gotten into trouble for their August 9 report, 'US experts insist runways cracked' (Bangkok Post, August 9, 2005): ...A team of US aviation experts is insisting that both runways at Suvarnabhumi airport need reconstruction as there are severe cracks that are large enough to sink the nose wheel of an aircraft, according to an aviation source... (The article has already been removed from the Post website) TNA responds with this oddly entitled article: Government spokesman to be responsible for misinformation to media - TNA, August 10, 2005 ...For instance, Mr Thaksin said, the fabricated news report in an English-language newspaper that a US engineer had quietly checked the cracked runways had damaged Thailand's reputation in the eyes of the world community that some persons might not visit Thailand because of their concern about such report... The next day the Post is apologizing for its story on the airport cracks while The Nation keeps the heat on.
Airport town not under BMA - Bangkok Post, February 23, 2005 ...The town will be established by appropriating a total of 63.92sq km of land from Prawet, Saphan Sung and Lat Krabang districts in Bangkok and 220sq km from Samut Prakan's Bang Pli district and Bang Sao Thong sub-district. ...Deputy city clerk Pichai Chaipotepanich said the airport town would definitely dilute some of city hall's administrative authority. The BMA would contribute its ideas in the drafting of the three laws. ... If the economic ramifications were substantial, city hall would consider asking for extra money from the government to make up for lost revenue. On the forum: 3D presentations of the new Bangkok airport - February 15, 2005 'Bangkok International Airport's consultant is Munich Airport' - luchtzak.be, December 26, 2005 Bangkok International Airport's consultant is Munich Airport. It will provide airport re-location and start of operations advice to the new BKK airport, that is due to open in late September 2005. Munich Airport indeed has some experience and expertsie in that field. More about the world's tallest
control tower - November 29, 2004
Dave, among others, alerted us to 2Bangkok.com being mentioned on the Airliners.net forum. The forumers there scoff at both Malaysian and Thai claims to have the world's tallest tower: Vancouver Harbour (Canada) at 465ft is the tallest in the world. It sits atop an office tower in downtown Vancouver and controls traffic (mainly seaplane and helicopter) into, out of and around vancouver Harbour... Earlier: Interesting airport tower thread on the 2Bangkok.com forum - November 26, 2004 Airport photos - November 21, 2004 Engineer who used
friendly persuasion on locals to sell their land looks back with pride
- Bangkok Post, October 24, 2004 Don
Muang Airport to become new govt hub - TNA, October
20, 2004 The airport expressway
- September 28, 2004 Expressway link for
Suvarnabhumi - Bangkok Post, September
25, 2004 City
planning only now getting underway around new airport
- Bangkok Post, May 26, 2004 2004
to be Year of new airport construction -
MCOT, December 30, 2003 New
airport infrastructure plan - Bangkok Post,
November 3, 2003 More
airport projects - The Nation, September
26, 2003 Giant
air control tower not yet started - delay a cause for 'serious concern'
- Bangkok Post, October 5, 2003
$9
billion security overhaul for LA airport
- USA Today, July 10, 2003
Interesting new concepts to be applied to LAX to combat terrorism that might have some relevance to the new Bangkok airport in the future: The plan would eliminate the ability of passengers to drive directly into the U-shaped terminal complex, where a car bomb could kill or injure passengers lined up at ticket counters. Instead, passengers would be dropped off at remote locations and receive a preliminary security screening before being whisked to their gates via people movers... United Airlines and its foreign carrier partners, including Lufthansa, Singapore, Thai, Asiana and Air New Zealand, endorse the proposal. But a group that says it represents 80 airlines at LAX says a majority of its members are opposed. Latest
supertruss photos - July 9, 2003
Criticism
over weak roof played down - Bangkok Post, July 5, 2003 A tale of two newspapers: The
airport roof Supertruss!
- thaiengineering.com, February 28, 2003 Work starts
on new airport runway 2 - Business Day,
February 7, 2003 Crucial
meeting called to address NBIA kinks -
Business Day, December 7, 2002 Airline
industry fears new airport might not open until 2007
- The Bangkok Post, November 27, 2002 Airport
will be completed on time - Business Day,
November 21, 2002 Red
tape to delay launch by one year - The
Bangkok Post, November 15, 2002 Plans
to make the new airport handle 40m passengers
- Business Day, November 12, 2002 Airport faces lengthy contractual delays
- The Bangkok Post, November 9, 2002 New airport "about six months behind schedule"
- Business Day, October 24, 2002 Murphy Jahn set to complete airport designs
- Business Day, October 22, 2002 More assurances about the airport
completion date - October 18, 2002 Words from the new transport minister
- October 5, 2002 Threats
over airport completion - Business
Day, September 11, 2002 Cash-rich
AAT upbeat on airport - The Nation, August 8, 2002 World's
9th busiest airport - The Nation, 06:13, June 8, 2002 Airport news from Wisarut Bholsithi
- May 10, 2002 New airport tour - 21:05, May
8, 2002 Italian-Thai able to build airport? - 07:36, March
20, 2002 Don Muang Airport to close in 2005? - February 1,
2002 Wan
stresses authority of AAT over new airport B47bn rail network to link capital with new airport
A panel has been set up to oversee construction of a 47-billion-baht
rail link between the capital and the new international airport at Nong
Ngu Hao in Samut Prakan. Where to put the jet fuel facility? Wisarut Bholsithi reports: Italian Thai has signed a deal with NBIA to construct a terminal, but PTT PCL (the national petroleum company privatized on Nov 1, 2001--the first lot of the company's stocks is sold out within minutes) is arguing with NBIA over the location of the jet fuel facility since NBIA awarded the jet fuel facility construction contract to BAFS (Bangkok Aviation Fuel Services) which is the company that handles jet fuel at Donmuang Airport. PTT said BAFS (Thailand Co. Ltd.) is going to construct the jet fuel facility on the land in the green belt area--far from the airport--while PTT PCL would build the facility within NBIA land. The winning bid and the likely opening
date Wisarut Bholsithi reports: Italian-Thai PCL (with the support from Japanese construction firms such as Takenaka and Obayashi) won the bid for terminal construction for the Suvannabhum Airport with a price tag of 36.60 billion Baht, 120 million baht lower than the set price of 36.7 billion baht, after cutting the costs to the bone. Victory of Italian-Thai PCL for the terminal bidding has stunned Ch. Karnchan PCL, Vijitraphan Co. Ltd., and Taisei-Mitsubishi. These firms said they never expected that Italian-Thai could cut the construction costs so much. Italian Thai PCL is still on the list for financial rehabilitation (recorded by the Stock Exchange of Thailand), but Japanese firms bailed Italian-Thai out of trouble so it was eligible to join the bidding. However, IATA (International Air Transportation Association) has warned that Suvannabhum Airport is unlikely to be completed on December 5, 2004, so Italian Thai PCL should focus on the ways to expand the capacity of Suvannabhum Airport to be able to carry at least 40 million passengers a year after opening on December 5, 2005 (or 2006) since the target of 30 million passengers a year (the same capacity as Donmuang Airport) during the first year of operation is unlikely. And according to Thaipost, October 16, 2001: Siam Commercial Bank PCL is backing up Italian-Thai PCL for the NBIA terminal construction with two sets of loans: 9 billion baht and 12 billion baht respectively. Even better, Obayashi and Takenaka (Japanese contractors) said they will continue the terminal construction even if Italian Thai PCL were to go bankrupt. The cabinet also paid 5.5 billion baht back to JBIC. NBIA passenger terminal construction
contract awarded Italian-Thai Development (Ital-Thai), under the umbrella of the ITO Joint Venture Group, was awarded the contract for the construction of the New Bangkok International Airport (NBIA)'s passenger terminal complex with an offer of 36 billion baht. The bid was announced at the NBIA office and was attended by representatives from the Communications Ministry, the Senate, the House of Representatives, the bidders and members of the media. Four groups participated in the bid, which had previously been delayed over questions of transparency: The ITO Joint Venture led by Ital-Thai, CKKB Joint Venture, led by CH Karnchang, SVNPK Joint Venture led by Vichitphan Construction and Taisei-Mitsubishi Joint Venture. The bids were based on the design revisions made by the Murphy/Jahn/TAMS/ACT consortium, which features a passenger terminal consisting of two adjoining buildings. Ital-Thai won the bid with its 36.666 billion baht offer. Of that amount, 15.085 billion baht will be used for the construction of one of the passenger terminal complex buildings, the remainder on the other building. The Taisei-Mitsubishi's 40.738 billion baht bid was the second lowest, 16.527 billion baht of which was earmarked for the construction of the passenger terminal. The highest bid came from the SVNPK group, who offered 49.213 billion baht. Communications Ministry permanent secretary Srisook Chandarangsu said in his capacity as acting NBIA president that the NBIA would call in the ITO group to discuss the construction in detail very soon. The NBIA would also inform the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), the project's financier, of the result of the bid as well. Srisook said that the JBIC would likely approve the bid by Nov 1 and has tentatively set the contract signing date for Nov 30. "We have done everything in accordance with the JBIC's conditions. The four original bidders were called in for the latest bidding contest. The whole process was done in a transparent manner. The JBIC should have no problem approving the loan. The construction will take roughly 36 months to complete and the airport will be operational by 2004 as scheduled," he said. Ital-Thai executive vice president Tawatchai Suthiprapha said the company was able to offer the lowest price because it has its own steel manufacturing plant in Saraburi province, with a capacity of up to 6,000 tonnes a month. On the possibility that the company might join hands with other bidders in proceeding with the construction, he said it was too soon to talk about the matter as Ital-Thai's joint partners were capable of completing the project on their own. Note about Latest News - October 1, 2001 New roads on tap for the airport area Odds and ends on the bidding process Cost blowout threatens further delay The Second Bangkok International Airways (Sbia), faces further delay thus resulting in significant economic loss. According to New Bangkok International Airport chairman General Mongkon the latest problem is a Bt8 billion cost blowout. Unless the passenger terminal and concourse building contract is awarded within the next few months, the Sbia or Suwannabhumi Airport, as it was recently named by His Majesty the King, will not be able to open in 2004 as scheduled. Nbia managing director Somjetr Tinnaphong said not opening the new airport as scheduled cost Bt200 billion in lost revenue annually, based on figures from the International Air Transport Association (Iata). The biggest losers from further delays would be the tourism, high-value manufacturing and agricultural industries, said Somjetr. The latest setback facing the Suwannabhumi Airport project stems from the fact that all four bids to construct the passenger terminal and the concourse complex are about Bt8 billion higher than the Bt45-billion budget estimate. In an attempt to bring the price down, Mongkon said four measures were being taken. The airports designer Murphy Jahn Consortium has been asked to modify the design to bring the price within the Bt45-billion budget. The government has also been asked to increase the budget. And the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, which is providing the Bt73-billion loan for construction work has been asked for assistance. Mongkon said he had agreed with Murphy Jahn that the design modification would be complete the soonest time possible. However, the government appears unable to extend the budget. It is as yet unsure whether the bidders will be able to reduce their prices. All initially refused to drop their prices, but the nbia is yet to begin official negotiations. Mongkon said that the government would have no choice but to seek help from the Japanese government as it is paying for the airports construction the Thai government and the Airport Authority of Thailand provide only the working capital. Mongkon said if the Nbia was lucky it would be able to finalize the Bt45-billion terminal and concourse contract within this year. Otherwise, the company could be required by the JBC to begin a new bidding process which would take another 18 months. The Thai Finance Ministry will be asked to help during the negotiations with the Japanese government. More delays at second airport threaten Bangkok's hub
status The threat of more delays and the loss of gateway status in the region looms over Bangkoks problem-plagued second international airport. Chairman of the airport project Gen Mongkol Ampornpisit said last week that Suvarnabhumi International Airport would be delayed again beyond the 5 December 2004 opening date that was fixed last year. Subsequent comments from Airport Authority of Thailand executives suggested the second airport could be delayed as much as two years to 2006. That would require another round of improvements to Don Muang costing an estimated Bt2 billion. Gen Mongkok warned a further delay to the second airport project would end Bangkoks bid to become the premier gateway in Asia and turn the airport into a branch hub of Singapore. Changi airport in Singapore plans to open its third passenger terminal in 2006, giving it a capacity for 64 million passengers a year. In its first phase Suvarnabhumi airport will be able to handle 30 million passengers a year. It will have two runways capable of handling 76 flights per hour. Last year Don Muang International Airport accommodated nearly 30 million passengers. When Don Muang completes its expansion plan in 2003, it will be able to accommodate up to 36 million passengers. By 2010 all phases should be ready, giving Suvarnabhumi airport a capacity to handle 112 flights per hour and 100 million passengers a year. It is now 40 years since the project was first initiated and only 20% of the construction has been completed. Construction of the passenger terminal should have started last November. Design flaws have pushed back the project already by three months, which could mean the airport cannot open on 5 December 2004. Murphy Jahn/TAMS/ACT, the design firm, was accused of dragging its feet on the design, which had to be adapted to meet a revised budget of Bt45,000 million. A clock is ticking at the airports development site. As of this publication date the clock shows 1,391 days to the opening date of 5 December 2004 but it has been estimated that it could take another 148 days considering current delays. Mr Mongkol said, if the airport could not open in 2004, many key airlines would move their regional bases to Singapore for at least 10 years and Thailand will lose a lot of revenue. New airport doomed to further turmoil - Bangkok Post, May 29, 2000 Even those in charge of the new Bangkok international airport project, alias Nong Ngu Hao, are hard pressed to confirm if the troubled project would be completed by its 2004 deadline. Delays have become a defining character of this four-decade-old project and only 13% has so far been completed. The reason, to put it simply, is politics and corruption. "Every big project has to deal with political influence. This is a national problem," said Deputy Premier and Commerce Minister Supachai Panitchpakdi, who chairs the New Bangkok International Airport Development Committee. He said that in the past, politicians had represented vested interests which tried to make profits from the 120-billion-baht project but he stressed with confidence that the ruling government was free of such problems. However, he would not be able to make the same assurances after the government ends its tenure this November. "Before the government ends, I will try to set a clear guideline that will guarantee the progress of the project," Mr Supachai said. "If we leave too many problems that need decisions, the project can be shaken. The construction of the new airport should not be delayed beyond 2004 or 2006." Sansern Wongcha-um, secretary-general of the National Economic and Social Development Board, admitted that the Nong Ngu Hao project had been problematic because of several government changes in the past. "That deprived the project of continuity in the management and real experts who should have been in charge of the implementation," he said. Although political changes would no longer affect the scheme because loan contracts and the NBIA guaranteed progress, political influence might still delay the completion, he said. "It is difficult to free Nong Ngu Hao from politics," NBIA managing director Somchet Tinapong said. The Nong Ngu Hao plan was first raised when a city planning consultant firm in 1960 advised the government that Bangkok should have a new airport so the activities of commercial airlines and the military at Don Muang airport could be separated. The firm suggested it should be located east of the capital because Bangkok was likely to grow in that direction. The following year, the Transport and Communications Ministry selected a vast land plot called "Nong Ngu Hao" (cobra swamp) in Bangphli district of Samut Prakan as the location for the development. It took a decade, from 1963 to 1973, for the Aviation Department to buy and expropriate private land and gather public land which forms the whole plot covering 19,800 rai (about 32 square kilometers) for the new construction. The project was shelved in the following five years and then the Transport and Communications Ministry hired another consultant firm to review it again in 1978. However, the scheme was shelved again for over a decade until 1991 when the Anand Panyarachun government decided it was time for the construction and assigned the Airports Authority of Thailand to implement the project. From that point, the AAT worked with its consultant on the master plan and the conceptual design of the whole airport and won cabinet approval in 1995 to join forces with the Finance Ministry to establish the subsidiary, NBIA. The serious move by the state to revive the project prompted the children of residents who lived on the airport site since the first land expropriation in 60's and 70's to demand a new round of compensation although their parents received compensation decades ago. To prove its endlessly problematic nature, the Nong Ngu Hao project ran into problems when Gen Chavalit Yongchaiyudh was deputy premier, in the Banharn Silpa-archa government. The general, overseeing the new Bangkok airport project, unexpectedly aired his idea in 1995 that the facility should be moved to Kamphaeng Saen in Nakhon Pathom, west of Bangkok. However, officials managed to convince him of scrapping this idea the same year. In 1996, it was revealed that the Nong Ngu Hao airport could not be completed by the 2000 schedule due to a delay in the passenger terminal design and the relocation of villagers from the project site. Problems over the design focused around a requirement for the contractor, the Murphy Jahn, TAMS and ACT consortium, to include the Thai identity into the passenger terminal, plus an added concern the design would cost more than the allocated budget. The delay gradually postponed the completion schedule of Nong Ngu Hao from 2000 to 2001 and then 2002. As a result, the authorities turned to an expansion of Don Muang airport so that it would be able to serve the increasing number of air traffic volumes pending the completion of Nong Ngu Hao. In January 1997, Gen Chavalit, as the newly-appointed prime minister, changed his mind again by proposing to relocate the new airport from Nong Ngu Hao to Bang Pu district in Samut Prakan where a new business city was being planned. The new location in the coastal district, that would require land reclamation from the sea, was raised after the state had spent about seven billion baht acquiring land in Nong Ngu Hao and signed various contracts worth over 14 billion baht with Thai and international companies for the development of the old location. The idea faded within a month after being attacked by members of both the government and the opposition. However, the Chavalit government decided to officially delay the Nong Ngu Hao project and switch more investment to expand Don Muang. It wanted Don Muang to serve Bangkok air traffic until 2007. In the meantime, it postponed the Nong Ngu Hao schedule to 2003 and reduced the airport's initial capacity from serving 30 million passengers annually to 20 million, and from having two runways to one. The opposition attacked the decision on the grounds the already-congested Don Muang could not bear an expansion, and the state would have to spend on funding the development at both Don Muang and Nong Ngu Hao. When the opposition came into power in late 1997, it revived the policy to develop Nong Ngu Hao as the number one airport for Bangkok and a regional aviation hub of Southeast Asia by 2003. The new government scaled down the Don Muang expansion while raising the initial capacity of Nong Ngu Hao back to 30 million annual passengers. The only quick and decisive, but suspicious, implementation of the new airport project was the effort to start the improvement of the swampy Nong Ngu Hao site. Sand and gravel had to be dumped on the site to compress the swampy soil and water drained out through special plastic pipes, called prefabricated vertical drains (PVD). A bid invitation for the landfill contract was announced in September 1996. The NBIA opened bids mid-November, swiftly evaluated them and signed the deal with the winning contractor, Italian-Thai Development Plc, in the same month. In the meantime, losing bidders complained to the Counter Corruption Commission about irregularities. Most bidders thought they were disqualified too fast and unfairly. Each contender had to pay 500,000 baht for tender documents. Out of 19 bidders, 13 found they were disqualified immediately upon opening the documents they had just bought. They were required to have installed five million metres of prefabricated vertical drains (PVD) within a three-year period before entering the bidding contest. Believing that the term was meant to favor some contenders, the losing bidders also raised a complaint with the Council of State which later found the contract terms unusual. Late in 1997, the council told the NBIA to scrap the landfill contract. The suggestion prompted the Transport Ministry to suspend the landfill in January 1998 to ask for the Office of the Attorney-General's ruling on the controversial deal. In the following month, the office took the same stance as the council and told the ministry to scrap the contract. However, the Transport Ministry dared not terminate the deal for fear of being sued by Italian-Thai Development (ITD), as it had spent heavily on the landfill. Though not losing the landfill contract outright, ITD had its job scaled down from the price of 11 billion baht to about seven billion baht, because the Chavalit administration decided to downsize the Nong Ngu Hao project from having two runways to one. In other words, one runway was being delayed. To complete the Nong Ngu Hao airport by 2004, the NBIA announced early last year that the piledriving of the passenger terminal would have to start by the middle of last year. The superstructure construction of the terminal began last January and the past four decades have resulted in only 13% of the work being carried out. NBIA managing director Somchet has based a progress report on money the state-owned company has spent so far on the project's implementation. After the upcoming general election, it will depend on the new government as to whether or not the Nong Ngu Hao deadline of 2004 will be met. |